World Journal of Chemical Education. 2022, 10(2), 65-75
DOI: 10.12691/WJCE-10-2-3
Original Research

Laboratory-Based Modules in an Organic Chemistry Classroom

Timm A. Knoerzer1 and Todd A. Davis1,

1Department of Chemistry, U. S. Air Force Academy, Academy, CO 80840, USA

Pub. Date: May 12, 2022

Cite this paper

Timm A. Knoerzer and Todd A. Davis. Laboratory-Based Modules in an Organic Chemistry Classroom. World Journal of Chemical Education. 2022; 10(2):65-75. doi: 10.12691/WJCE-10-2-3

Abstract

Student engaged learning has been at the forefront of chemical education for the past several decades. Improving student engagement leads to increased retention of information being presented in lecture and laboratory-based settings. With this goal in mind, three laboratory-based learning modules were developed to address difficult learning areas in organic chemistry (acid/base/extractions, substitution reactions, and aromaticity). These data-driven modules focus on students using critical thinking skills to analyze data and answer guided questions in these trouble areas. The implementation of modules and an evaluation of effectiveness are presented.

Keywords

organic chemistry, lab-based learning modules, data analysis

Copyright

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References

[1]  Moog, R.S., Spencer, J.N. POGIL: An Overview. ACS Symposium Series, 2008, 994, 1-13.
 
[2]  Eberlein, T., Kampmeier, J., Minderhout, V., Moog, R.S., Platt, T., Varma-Nelson, P., White, H.B. Pedagogies of Engagement in Science. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ., 2008, 36(4), 262-273.
 
[3]  Walker, L., Warfa, A.-R. M. Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL®) Marginally Effects Student Achievement Measures but Substantially Increases the Odds of Passing a Course. PLOS One, 2017, 1-17.
 
[4]  Hein, S.M. Positive Impacts Using POGIL in Organic Chemistry. J. Chem. Ed., 2012, 89, 860-864.
 
[5]  DeMatteo, M.P. Combining POGIL and a Flipped Classroom Methodology in Organic Chemistry. ACS Symposium Series, 2019, 1336, 217-240.
 
[6]  Lyle, K.S., Robinson, W.R. A Statistical Evaluation: Peer-led Team Learning in an Organic Chemistry Course. J. Chem. Ed., 2003, 80, 132-134.
 
[7]  Lewis, S.E. Retention and Reform: An Evaluation of Peer-Led Team Learning. J. Chem. Ed., 2011, 88, 703-707.
 
[8]  Wamser, C.C. Peer-Led Team Learning in Organic Chemistry: Effects on Student Performance, Success, and Persistence in the Course. J. Chem. Ed., 2006, 83, 1562-1566.
 
[9]  Wilson, S.B., Varma-Nelson, P. Small Groups, Significant Impact: A Review of Peer-Led Team Learning Research with Implications for STEM Education Researchers and Faculty. J. Chem. Ed., 2016, 93(10), 1686-1702.
 
[10]  Schmidt, H.G., Rotgans, J. I., Yew, E.H.J. The process of problem-based learning: what works and why. Med. Educ., 2011, 45(8), 792-806.
 
[11]  Dolmans, D.H.J.M., Loyens, S.F.M., Marcq, H., Gijbels, D. Deep and surface learning in problem-based learning: a review of the literature. Adv. Health Sci. Educ., 2016, 21, 1087-1112.
 
[12]  Srinivasan, M., Wilkes, M., Stevenson, F., Nguyen, T., Slavin, S. Comparing Problem-Based Learning with Case-Based Learning: Effects of a Major Curricular Shift at Two Institutions. Academic Medicine, 2007, 82(1), 74-82.
 
[13]  Allchin, D. Problem- and Case-Based Learning in Science: An Introduction to Distinctions, Values, and Outcomes. CBE Life Sci. Educ., 2017, 12(3), 364-372.
 
[14]  Kulak, V., Newton, G. A guide to using case-based learning in biochemistry education. Biochem. Mol. Bio. Educ., 2014, 42(6), 457-473.
 
[15]  Herreid, C.F. ConfChem Conference on Case-Based Studies in Chemical Education: The Future of Case Study Teaching in Science. J. Chem. Ed., 2013, 90(2), 256-257.
 
[16]  Ryan, M.D., Reid, S.A., Impact of the Flipped Classroom on Student Performance and Retention: A Parallel Controlled Study in General Chemistry. J. Chem. Educ., 2016, 93(1), 13-23.
 
[17]  Rossi, R.D. ConfChem Conference on Flipped Classroom: Improving Student Engagement in Organic Chemistry Using the Inverted Classroom Model. J. Chem. Educ., 2015, 92(9), 1577-1579.
 
[18]  Poon, T., Rivera, J. The Flipped Classroom as an Approach for Improving Student Learning and Enhancing Instructor Experiences in Organic Chemistry. ACS Symposium Series, 2015, 1193, 29-42.
 
[19]  Hatch, J. Better teachers are needed to improve science education. Nature, 2018, 562, S2-S4.
 
[20]  Davis, T., Holman, R.W. Interrelating conjugation, aromaticity, and the acid-base chemistry of aromatics via a computational question-driven exercise. Chem. Educ., 2013, 18, 33-34.
 
[21]  https://www.chemedx.org/jce-online/jce-digital-library.
 
[22]  Martínez-Jiménez, P., Pontes-Pedrajas, A., Polo, J., Climent–Bellido, M.S. Learning in chemistry with virtual laboratories. J. Chem. Ed., 2003, 80, 346-352.
 
[23]  Stone, D.C. Teaching Chromatography Using Virtual Laboratory Exercises. J. Chem. Educ., 2007, 84(9), 1488-1496.
 
[24]  Ferrell, J.B., Campbell, J.P., McCarthy, D.R., McKay, K.T., Hensinger, M., Srinivasan, R., Zhao, X., Wurthmann, A., Li, J., Schneebeli, S.T. Chemical Exploration with Virtual Reality in Organic Teaching Laboratories J. Chem. Educ., 2019, 96(9), 1961-1966.
 
[25]  Norasiken, B., Halimah Badioze, Z., Massila, K., Kamaruzaman, J., Noorli, K. An effective virtual laboratory approach for chemistry. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci., 2013, 7(3), 78-84.
 
[26]  Szu, E., Nandagopal, K., Shavelson, R.J., Lopez, E.J., Penn, J.H., Scharberg, M., Hill, G.W. Understanding Academic Performance in Organic Chemistry. J. Chem. Educ., 2011, 88(9), 1238-1242.
 
[27]  Crimmins, M.T., Midkiff, B. High Structure Active Learning Pedagogy for the Teaching of Organic Chemistry: Assessing the Impact on Academic Outcomes. J. Chem. Educ., 2017, 94(4), 429-438.
 
[28]  Grove, N.P., Lowery-Bretz, S. Perry’s Scheme of Intellectual and Epistemological Development as a framework for describing student difficulties in learning organic chemistry. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2010, 11, 207-211.
 
[29]  Taagepera, M., Noori, S. Mapping Students’ Thinking Patterns in Learning Organic Chemistry by the Use of Knowledge Space Theory. J. Chem. Educ., 2000, 77(9), 1224-1229.
 
[30]  Cooper, M.M., Stowe, R.L., Crandell, O.M., Klymkowsky, M.W. Organic Chemistry, Life, the Universe and Everything (OCLUE): A Transformed Organic Chemistry Curriculum. J. Chem. Educ., 2019, 96(9), 1858-1872.