Timm A. Knoerzer and Todd A. Davis. Laboratory-Based Modules in an Organic Chemistry Classroom.
. 2022; 10(2):65-75. doi: 10.12691/WJCE-10-2-3
organic chemistry, lab-based learning modules, data analysis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit
[1] | Moog, R.S., Spencer, J.N. POGIL: An Overview. ACS Symposium Series, 2008, 994, 1-13. |
|
[2] | Eberlein, T., Kampmeier, J., Minderhout, V., Moog, R.S., Platt, T., Varma-Nelson, P., White, H.B. Pedagogies of Engagement in Science. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ., 2008, 36(4), 262-273. |
|
[3] | Walker, L., Warfa, A.-R. M. Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL®) Marginally Effects Student Achievement Measures but Substantially Increases the Odds of Passing a Course. PLOS One, 2017, 1-17. |
|
[4] | Hein, S.M. Positive Impacts Using POGIL in Organic Chemistry. J. Chem. Ed., 2012, 89, 860-864. |
|
[5] | DeMatteo, M.P. Combining POGIL and a Flipped Classroom Methodology in Organic Chemistry. ACS Symposium Series, 2019, 1336, 217-240. |
|
[6] | Lyle, K.S., Robinson, W.R. A Statistical Evaluation: Peer-led Team Learning in an Organic Chemistry Course. J. Chem. Ed., 2003, 80, 132-134. |
|
[7] | Lewis, S.E. Retention and Reform: An Evaluation of Peer-Led Team Learning. J. Chem. Ed., 2011, 88, 703-707. |
|
[8] | Wamser, C.C. Peer-Led Team Learning in Organic Chemistry: Effects on Student Performance, Success, and Persistence in the Course. J. Chem. Ed., 2006, 83, 1562-1566. |
|
[9] | Wilson, S.B., Varma-Nelson, P. Small Groups, Significant Impact: A Review of Peer-Led Team Learning Research with Implications for STEM Education Researchers and Faculty. J. Chem. Ed., 2016, 93(10), 1686-1702. |
|
[10] | Schmidt, H.G., Rotgans, J. I., Yew, E.H.J. The process of problem-based learning: what works and why. Med. Educ., 2011, 45(8), 792-806. |
|
[11] | Dolmans, D.H.J.M., Loyens, S.F.M., Marcq, H., Gijbels, D. Deep and surface learning in problem-based learning: a review of the literature. Adv. Health Sci. Educ., 2016, 21, 1087-1112. |
|
[12] | Srinivasan, M., Wilkes, M., Stevenson, F., Nguyen, T., Slavin, S. Comparing Problem-Based Learning with Case-Based Learning: Effects of a Major Curricular Shift at Two Institutions. Academic Medicine, 2007, 82(1), 74-82. |
|
[13] | Allchin, D. Problem- and Case-Based Learning in Science: An Introduction to Distinctions, Values, and Outcomes. CBE Life Sci. Educ., 2017, 12(3), 364-372. |
|
[14] | Kulak, V., Newton, G. A guide to using case-based learning in biochemistry education. Biochem. Mol. Bio. Educ., 2014, 42(6), 457-473. |
|
[15] | Herreid, C.F. ConfChem Conference on Case-Based Studies in Chemical Education: The Future of Case Study Teaching in Science. J. Chem. Ed., 2013, 90(2), 256-257. |
|
[16] | Ryan, M.D., Reid, S.A., Impact of the Flipped Classroom on Student Performance and Retention: A Parallel Controlled Study in General Chemistry. J. Chem. Educ., 2016, 93(1), 13-23. |
|
[17] | Rossi, R.D. ConfChem Conference on Flipped Classroom: Improving Student Engagement in Organic Chemistry Using the Inverted Classroom Model. J. Chem. Educ., 2015, 92(9), 1577-1579. |
|
[18] | Poon, T., Rivera, J. The Flipped Classroom as an Approach for Improving Student Learning and Enhancing Instructor Experiences in Organic Chemistry. ACS Symposium Series, 2015, 1193, 29-42. |
|
[19] | Hatch, J. Better teachers are needed to improve science education. Nature, 2018, 562, S2-S4. |
|
[20] | Davis, T., Holman, R.W. Interrelating conjugation, aromaticity, and the acid-base chemistry of aromatics via a computational question-driven exercise. Chem. Educ., 2013, 18, 33-34. |
|
[21] | https://www.chemedx.org/jce-online/jce-digital-library. |
|
[22] | Martínez-Jiménez, P., Pontes-Pedrajas, A., Polo, J., Climent–Bellido, M.S. Learning in chemistry with virtual laboratories. J. Chem. Ed., 2003, 80, 346-352. |
|
[23] | Stone, D.C. Teaching Chromatography Using Virtual Laboratory Exercises. J. Chem. Educ., 2007, 84(9), 1488-1496. |
|
[24] | Ferrell, J.B., Campbell, J.P., McCarthy, D.R., McKay, K.T., Hensinger, M., Srinivasan, R., Zhao, X., Wurthmann, A., Li, J., Schneebeli, S.T. Chemical Exploration with Virtual Reality in Organic Teaching Laboratories J. Chem. Educ., 2019, 96(9), 1961-1966. |
|
[25] | Norasiken, B., Halimah Badioze, Z., Massila, K., Kamaruzaman, J., Noorli, K. An effective virtual laboratory approach for chemistry. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci., 2013, 7(3), 78-84. |
|
[26] | Szu, E., Nandagopal, K., Shavelson, R.J., Lopez, E.J., Penn, J.H., Scharberg, M., Hill, G.W. Understanding Academic Performance in Organic Chemistry. J. Chem. Educ., 2011, 88(9), 1238-1242. |
|
[27] | Crimmins, M.T., Midkiff, B. High Structure Active Learning Pedagogy for the Teaching of Organic Chemistry: Assessing the Impact on Academic Outcomes. J. Chem. Educ., 2017, 94(4), 429-438. |
|
[28] | Grove, N.P., Lowery-Bretz, S. Perry’s Scheme of Intellectual and Epistemological Development as a framework for describing student difficulties in learning organic chemistry. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2010, 11, 207-211. |
|
[29] | Taagepera, M., Noori, S. Mapping Students’ Thinking Patterns in Learning Organic Chemistry by the Use of Knowledge Space Theory. J. Chem. Educ., 2000, 77(9), 1224-1229. |
|
[30] | Cooper, M.M., Stowe, R.L., Crandell, O.M., Klymkowsky, M.W. Organic Chemistry, Life, the Universe and Everything (OCLUE): A Transformed Organic Chemistry Curriculum. J. Chem. Educ., 2019, 96(9), 1858-1872. |
|