Simplification of Combustion Analysis

Balakrishnan Viswanathan^1, and Mohamed Shajahan Gulam Razul¹

¹Department of Chemistry, St. Francis Xavier University, PO Box 5000, Antigonish, NS B2G 2W5, Canada

Cite this paper

Balakrishnan Viswanathan and Mohamed Shajahan Gulam Razul. Simplification of Combustion Analysis. World Journal of Chemical Education. 2020; 8(2):100-103. doi: 10.12691/WJCE-8-2-6

Abstract

Combustion analysis is typically taught within the context of molecular stoichiometry, in particular the study of empirical formula. This approach is rich in the history of chemistry and also relevant to current laboratory practice. However, the complexity inherent in the traditional approach is not suitable for beginning learners; what should be a rich context for exploring chemical connections has in effect been reduced to an algorithm to be memorized. It is proposed that combustion analysis be taught within the context of limiting reagents, as this represents an ideal situation (one reactant in limited quantity and the other in infinite quantity). Moving the pedagogical position of this topic from molecular stoichiometry to reaction stoichiometry reduces the complexity of the problem from four steps to two. More importantly, the proposed method makes it possible to harness the knowledge that students have acquired earlier in the course to solve a problem in a new context. In the new approach, students match coefficients (computed on the reactant side with unknown on the product side) to obtain the composition of the substance being combusted. It is expected that the connection to prior knowledge and acquired skills will help students achieve improved success when solving problems of this nature.

Keywords

general chemistry, stoichiometry, combustion, limiting reagents, algorithms

Copyright

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References

[1]	T.L. Brown, H.E. LeMay Jr., B.E. Bursten, C.J. Murphy, P.M. Woodward, M.W. Stoltzfus, M.W. Lufaso, Chemistry: The Central Science, 14th ed., Pearson, New York, New York, 2018.
[2]	I.D. Reingold, A Concrete Analogy for Combustion Analysis Problems, J. Chem. Educ. 72 (1995) 222-223.
[3]	E. Yuriev, S. Naidu, L.S. Schembri, J.L. Short, Scaffolding the development of problem-solving skills in chemistry: guiding novice students out of dead ends and false starts, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 18 (2017) 486-504.
[4]	H. Sevian, V. Talanquer, Rethinking chemistry: a learning progression on chemical thinking, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 15 (2014) 10-23.
[5]	A. Gilewski, E. Mallory, M. Sandoval, M. Litvak, L. Ye, Does linking help? Effects and student perceptions of a learner-centered assessment implemented in introductory chemistry, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 20 (2019) 399-411.
[6]	J.R. Hartman, E.A. Nelson, “Do we need to memorize that?” or cognitive science for chemists, Found. Chem. 17 (2015) 263-274.
[7]	M.M.W. Cheng, Students’ visualisation of chemical reactions - insights into the particle model and the atomic model, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 19 (2018) 227-239.
[8]	M.S. Silberberg, Principles of General Chemistry, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, Dubuque, IA, 2010.