Photobromination (S_R) and Corresp. S_N1 Reactions – Key Reactions for the Development and the Application of the Concept of Hyperconjugation

Marc Zimmermann¹, Dennis Domke¹ and Michael Schween^1,

¹Fachbereich Chemie, Philipps-Universität, Marburg, Germany

Cite this paper

Marc Zimmermann, Dennis Domke and Michael Schween. Photobromination (S_R) and Corresp. S_N1 Reactions – Key Reactions for the Development and the Application of the Concept of Hyperconjugation. World Journal of Chemical Education. 2021; 9(4):175-184. doi: 10.12691/WJCE-9-4-10

Abstract

This article first describes photochemical bromination reactions of two different reactants proceeding via electron septet intermediates according to the radical substitution reaction mechanism (S_R). The case comparison is intended to enable learners – high school or university first-year organic chemistry students – to work out the concept of hyperconjugation, which is very significant for organic chemistry, by intertwining experimental results and theoretical interpretation (of free radical intermediates) closely. Since students often do not succeed in transferring concepts they have already learned from one mechanism to another, the second step will be to transfer and apply the concept of hyperconjugation to carbenium ions as reactive intermediates by means of an analogous experimental case comparison of first-order nucleophilic substitution reactions (S_N1).

Keywords

hyperconjugation, concept development, concept transfer and application, contrasting cases, reaction mechanisms

Copyright

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References

[1]	Graulich, N., “The Tip of the Iceberg”, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 16, 9-21, 2015.
[2]	Bhattacharyya G. and Bodner G.M., “‘It gets me to the product’: how students propose organic mechanisms”, J. Chem. Educ., 82, 1402-1407, 2005.
[3]	Grove, N.P. and Bretz, S.L., “Perry’s Scheme of Intellectual and Epistemological Development as a framework for describing student difficulties in learning organic chemistry”, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 11, 2010, 207-211.
[4]	Sevian, H., Talanquer, V., “Rethinking chemistry: a learning progression on chemical thinking” Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 15, 10-23, 2014.
[5]	Kraft, A., Strickland, A.M. and Bhattacharyya, G.,”Reasonable reasoning: multi-variate problem-solving in organic chemistry”, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 11, 281-292, 2010.
[6]	Cooper, M.M., Grove, N., Underwood, S.M., and Klymkowsky, M.W., “Lost in Lewis Structures: An Investigation of Student Difficulties in Developing Representational Competence”, J. Chem. Educ., 87, 869-874, 2010.
[7]	Talanquer, V., “Commonsense Chemistry: A Model for Understanding Students' Alternative Conceptions”, J. Chem. Educ., 83, 811-816, 2006.
[8]	M. M. Cooper, L. M. Corley, S. M. Underwood, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2013, (50), 699-721.
[9]	Popova, M., Bretz, S.L., “Organic chemistry students’ interpretations of the surface features of reaction coordinate diagrams”, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 19, 919-931, 2018.
[10]	Anzovino, M.E., Bretz, S.L., “Organic chemistry students' fragmented ideas about the structure and function of nucleophiles and electrophiles: a concept map analysis”, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 17, 1019-1029, 2016,
[11]	DeFever, R.S., Bruce, H., Bhattacharyya, G., “Mental Rolodexing: Senior Chemistry Majors’ Understanding of Chemical and Physical Properties”, J. Chem. Educ. 92, 415-426, 2015.
[12]	Cruz-Ramírez de Arellano, D. C.-R.; Towns, M., “Students understanding of alkyl halide reactions in undergraduate organic chemistry”, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 15, 501-515, 2014.
[13]	Grove, N. P.; Bretz, S. L., ”A continuum of learning: from rote memorization to meaningful learning in organic chemistry”. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 13, 201-208, 2012.
[14]	Bhattacharyya, G. “Practitioner development in organic chemistry: how graduate students conceptualize organic acids.” Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 7, 240-247, 2006.
[15]	Graulich, N., Schween, M., “Concept-Oriented Task Design: Making Purposeful Case Comparisons in Organic Chemistry”, J. Chem. Educ., 95, 376-383, 2018.
[16]	Luo, Y. R., Comprehensive Handbook of Chemical Bond Energies, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2007.
[17]	https://sdbs.db.aist.go.jp/sdbs/cgi-bin/cre_index.cgi [accessed Sep. 22, 2021].
[18]	Hedinger. https://www.der-hedinger.de/chemophon-akustischer-leitfähigkeitsprüfer-65361 [accessed Sep. 21, 2021].
[19]	Newton, T.A., Hill, B.A., “Using Conductivity Devices in Nonaqueous Solutions I: Demonstrating the SN1 Mechanism”, J. Chem. Educ., 81, 58-60, 2004.
[20]	https://www.amazon.de/dp/B01LN74PZY?psc=1&ref=ppx_pop_dt_b_asin_title [accessed Oct. 21, 2021].